[WikiEN-l] Article deletion

Fri Sep 16 00:43:07 UTC 2005

On 9/16/05, SPUI <drspui at gmail.com> wrote:
> MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
> > I was talking about an argument that doesn't involve anything de facto.
> > While most people consider presidents clearly notable, I explained the
> > reasons you could use to point it out.
> >
> > My government also designates whether the field behind my house will
> > be designated as a residential area or a green place. That doesn't
> > neccesarily mean the place warrants an article.
> >
> > It's exactly the comments that claim a certain category of articles is
> > worth an entry by default (or not) that I'm trying to avoid here.
> > Those are the cause of endless inclusionist vs. deletionist debates.
> >
> > Can you actually point out any reasons that don't depend on de facto
> > or by default notability?
> 
> The state has decided to spend money not only to buy the right-of-way
> and maintain the road but to post markers that indicate that to the
> public and help them identify the road as a more important road. That to
> me says "notable".


sorvrin states have spent money on may things over the years. That
doesn't make them notable.
-- 
geni