On 9/14/05, JAY JG <jayjg(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
No, the real claim is "AfD is damaging the
project and should be deleted".
The burden of proof is on those who make that claim.
Quite so. I have seen scores of posts to this list that claim that
AfD damages Wikipedia and its culture, but never actually any
_evidence_.
What do you think constitutes evidence? I've already said that I'm
not lending my experience and knowledge of WP to evaluating the
worthiness of articles because of the way the process works. I'm not
so egotistical as to claim that my absence from AfD materially
damages WP, but the last time I looked (a while ago) people were
making mistakes that I could have corrected.
Stan