On 9/14/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/14/05, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
geni wrote:
...And
WP:CP could still take use of the admin deletion features...
not if you are aiming
for PWD.
He just said that he's not, at least when it comes to dealing with
copyright problems. You're the only one I've seen in this thread who's
suggesting that PWD would be used that way. Why can't VfD and CP use
different ways of deleting pages?
Because accuseing something of being a copyvio will become a lot more
common rather than being a tectic of last resort.
We don't just delete copyvios because they're accused of it. We tend
to delete them when they're properly accused of it, tagged (with a
link of where it's from), rot on [[WP:CP]] for a month or so, and if
it's really a copyvio (or just nobody figures out it isn't..), it's
deleted. With PWD being used for regular deletions, theoretically we
could have more admins to work on [[WP:CP]].
As for the delete warring, there's no reason an admin couldn't come
around, protect the page, and use {{deletedpage}}, like we already do
when people try to repeatedly re-create deleted materials, or protect
it on an undeleted version, like we already do when people vandalize
articles heavily.