[WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea

Wed Sep 14 15:30:47 UTC 2005

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JAY JG wrote:
> > From: Dan Grey <dangrey at gmail.com>
> >
> > On 13/09/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > But keeping unencyclopedic ones hurts Wikipedia too.
> >
> > Does it? How?
> 
> It reduces the credibility of the project.

In whose eyes? And why should we care what other people think of how
credible our project is in the short term? We're going to be here for
centuries hence.

Yours sincerely,
- --
James D. Forrester
Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
E-Mail    : james at jdforrester.org
IM (MSN)  : jamesdforrester at hotmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDKEInkn3kUxZyJx0RAlujAKCJhjelK3zDW7hzOzuX3jmO8hRwpgCaAkpp
F5/h0gOmpx6VaIecO+wjQmw=
=Nxyl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----