[WikiEN-l] Indefinite Bans with No Oversight

Wed Sep 14 05:39:05 UTC 2005

SV wrote:
> At [[Terrorism]], he inserted a bunch of made-up and
> bizarre definitions of terrorism, 

The diff is below - it doesnt seem to be too out of
line. Its certainly not in a good style of
organization for an intro, and certainly reinstating
it as if he owned the place was a disruption.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism&diff=21668376&oldid=21667884

> (the consensus version, as he called it)

Whatever.

> the trolling continued on the talk page, with him
> holding forth, organizing polls, insulting people
etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Zephram_Stark

RFC seems to be just as "toxic" (ie. rumor mill) as
IRC, so that alone isnt impressive. The charge of
insulting and trolling seems quite well established
though.

> "This place is a joke. It's too bad, because it had
> possibilities before all
> you fucking Jews came along ..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZephram_Stark&diff=22814466&oldid=22814157

Um, yeah. That particular comment doesnt typically
make friends and influence uncles.

> That's about it, but it's hopefully enough.

Nice work. Send to Arbcom to formalize.

SV

__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com