Fastfission wrote:
Actually, add on to this another question: What about
"limited licensed"
images on user pages? For example, "A picture of me and my dog. For use on
my user page on Wikipedia only." Obviously this wouldn't work on any article
page, but do we care if such images are used on user pages?
I'd tend to lead towards "no", simply because user pages must follow
Wikipedia license guidelines, I'd assume.
Some people have suggested putting userspace pages under "Wikipedia
only" licenses by default as a solution to forks and mirrors taking user
pages and the like. *If* that happened, then "limited license" images
would be OK on user pages. But that's a mighty big *if*.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \