On 9/13/05, steve v <vertigosteve(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
In that sense, having Disambiguation sections might
be
a hindrance, but its at least more definitive and
organized than hatnotes, which just obstruct from the
article.
SV
By hatnotes, do you mean the notes at the top of pages that
disambiguate? If so, I really see no problem with these, other then
sometimes the primary disambiguation is set up stupid. (Imagine band
called USA, and someone decided to give them primary disambiguation
over the country...). I think a disambiguation section would be much
worse. If there's more then one other thing the name could be, and the
article has primary disambiguation, and *really* should have it, then
there should be a link to the disambiguation on the top of the page.
I happen to like our current disambiguation setup.