On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Alphax wrote:
Bryan Derksen wrote:
Alphax wrote:
So you don't think that any articles need to
be deleted (outside of
candidates for speedy deletion), ever?
Not speaking for Phroziac, of course, but what's wrong with that?
Articles could still be merged and redirected without VfD, so any
information that's not speediable would still find its proper place in
Wikipedia.
Alright, let's rename AfD to "Article for Merge and Redirecting" (AfMR).
Now all we can argue about^W^W^Whave to decide is where to redirect the
articles to.
I admit I've only read a few pieces of this discussion, but has anyone
proposed redefining "AfD" to be the abbreviation for "Articles for
Discussion"? That would move the process even further from appearing
to be Wikipedia's variant of being the law West of the Pecos.
Geoff