On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Pawe³ Dembowski wrote:
What you are
proposing is primary source information. Wikipedia is
not a primary source. It is basically a tertiary (and to a small
extent, secondary) source. This is what no original research means:
don't do research that no-one has done before. I'd say someone
_doing_ research on a bus stop makes it fairly noteworthy...
Sam
The primary source of bus stop information is my local bus company's
website. Basing articles on their schedule would not be original
research.
There is also a practical, though I think unwritten, rule against
articles that can never be anything more than stubs.
-Snowspinner