[WikiEN-l] Re: Cruft

Sun Sep 11 10:41:15 UTC 2005

>>
>
> As a criterion for new articles, I agree. But the trouble is that 
> people use it
> for pushing junk into existing articles. Take [[Ark of the Covenant]] 
> recently:
> should a sensible article like this include stuff about it being an
> extraterrestrial communications device and an early example of a 
> capacitor, just
> because its verifiable that people have said it was? There is a junk 
> science /
> psuedo science problem.

If the sources are credible, then yes. If it gets too big, make a 
daughter article. Problem solved.

Ryan