[WikiEN-l] Re: Cruft

Sun Sep 11 08:11:06 UTC 2005

Dan Grey wrote:
> On 10/09/05, Kat Walsh <mindspillage at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
<snip>
> 
>>Where such an article can't be merged into something larger, it's
>>probably because it is too trivial for the next broader level of
>>detail and probably shouldn't be included at all (for example, I
>>wouldn't even be worth mentioning in my university's article: it would
>>rightly get deleted were a sentence about me to be added) -- or if it
>>should be included, indicative that we have a big gaping hole
>>somewhere in our coverage and need to write the article for the next
>>broader level (for example, an individual folk song from a country on
>>which there is no "music of X" article yet).
> 
> 
> What should and shouldn't be an article is covered by wp:verifiability and NOR.
> 
> 

Excuse me while I go and add articles on all the monsters from Dungeons
and Dragons then...

-- 
Alphax                      |   /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred   |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613  |    X   Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up    |   / \