For a tad more privacy, but something that remain available should anyone
need it, what about putting in on a subpage, deleting the subpage, and then
putting an "admins only" link (ie, any admin can access it, so the
permission stays with the project even if you leave, but it is not openly
available to the public.
Just a thought.
Ian
On 8/31/05, Nick Boalch <n.g.boalch(a)durham.ac.uk> wrote:
Theresa Knott wrote:
What is
the prevailing etiquette on what to do with positive responses
to requests for confirmation of licensing permission?
I think as long as you remove the IP, the email address and other
sensitive info, I doubt that anyone would object to the email being
copied to the talk page would they?
No, I can't imagine they would -- but if this sensitive info is removed
then there's essentially no difference between an emailed authorisation
and a random anonymous editor on the talk page claiming to be the
author. Is my word that the confirmation was real enough?
Cheers,
N.
--
Nicholas Boalch
School of Modern Languages & Cultures Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 3420
University of Durham Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 3421
New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK WWW:
http://nick.frejol.org/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l