[WikiEN-l] Unilateral action contrary to a vote from a rouge admnin, David Gerard

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Unilateral action contrary to a vote from a rouge admnin, David Gerard
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Unilateral action contrary to a vote from a rouge admnin, David Gerard
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/27/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> The twoversions template didn't say anything about what
> the _nature_ of the dispute between the two versions was, and it doesn't
> give any indication that the two-version situation is good or permanent
> (perhaps more emphasis can be added when it's restored that it's only a
> temporary measure), so I don't think it'll be a tool for POV-splitting
> articles in the long run. Perhaps if someone thinks it might be they
> should check the articles that use it to see how long the template's
> been in use on each.

The problem with {{twoversions}} is when it becomes a way of life for
the article.

Too bad we can't rig it so the template explodes after seven days.

Kelly

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Unilateral action contrary to a vote from a rouge admnin, David Gerard
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Unilateral action contrary to a vote from a rouge admnin, David Gerard
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]