On 10/26/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/26/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikispam(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Supports what consensus? I just said, if people
can't come to a general
agreement, then there *is* no consensus. You seem to be mistaking
majority
with consensus.
General aggreement isn't going to happen any more on anything. As such
in order to get things done we have to shift over to super majority.
If you don't like this go and join a smaller project.
--
geni
Like I said, I can come to accept it if the process is changed from
consensus to majority rule. If you think Wikipedia should drop consensus as
a goal, by all means make that argument. What I don't accept is redefining
the term consensus to mean majority rule.
Anthony