First, I'd like to state that, in general, I
support Wikipedia being
explicit in its illustration where necessary. I have never had a
problem with potentially-offensive photos on pages like [[penis]],
[[clitoris]] and the like.
You have never had a problem with from an American viewpoint
potentially-offensive images? OK. I have never had a problem with
potentially-offensive photos (and text!) on pages like [[female]],
[[hair]], [[feet]], [[homosexual]], etc... By saying that only
[[penis]] and [[clitoris]] are potentially offensive but not the other
examples I mentioned, you are implying that your viewpoint is the
supreme one and more important than all others.
I don't really understand what you're getting at here, but I'd like to point
out that I'm British, not American.
-- Matt
Wikipedia:
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security
Centre.