[WikiEN-l] RE: Blocking Proposal
Fl Celloguy
flcelloguy at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 19 18:47:25 UTC 2005
> > What's wrong with that? I repeat, Wikipedia should let *anyone* edit.
>Just
> > because someone uses AOL doesn't mean s/he should have to register and
> > create an account to edit. We're "forcing" users, to quote from you, to
> > register when the whole point of Wikipedia is that you don't need to
> > register to edit.
>
> I really can't figure out what you're arguing here, though. Because right
>now, when an AOL IP is blocked, you can't edit using it regardless of
>whether or not you register. As I understand it, the proposal is to allow
>logged in users to edit when they otherwise wouldn't.
> Sure, this might lead to admins being more liberal with IP blocks, but it
>doesn't require it - whether or not admins are more liberal with IP blocks
>is a separate issue, and we could pass policies to ensure that this doesn't
>happen.
>
>
True, but right now AOL IP blocks are kept to a minimum, and I haven't seen
an AOL range block in a long time. From the proposal: "This new form of
blocking will only affect specific IP addresses, most obviously will be AOL,
which would almost certainly be blocked due to the level of vandalism. " If
this proposal was implemented, it would almost be certain that AOL IPs would
be continuously blocked or blocked indefinitely. In addition, so many
schools and public-use computers would also almost certainly be blocked
using this method. But that's not the main point: the main point is that
we're restricting editing from IP addresses, which in itself is against the
spirit of wikis and especially of Wikipedia. We're proposing punishing a
large majority of internet users for a small percentage of troublesome
vandals. In addition, my opinion is that this won't deter vandalism but will
instead encourage vandalism. I see very few benefits in this proposal. We
don't have a problem with vandalism right now; we have a problem with
getting enough contributors to edit and write, as evidenced with the
articles [[Bill Gates]] and [[Jane Fonda]]. Are we to scare off
contributors, encourage vandalism, and go against the spirit of the wiki? I
sure hope not, and I personally think that this policy would be detrimental
to Wikipedia.
Thanks.
Flcelloguy
>From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list