From: "Fl Celloguy"
<flcelloguy(a)hotmail.com>
What's wrong with not letting the 25 million + AOL
users not edit
anonymously? I thought the whole point of Wikipedia was that anyone could
edit - this has already been discussed extensively on the Village Pump, and
this is taking us one step closer to the precipice of not letting anonymous
users edit. We don't want to stop anonymous editing for a significant
portion of users.
I hold this truth to be self-evident: the whole point of Wikipedia is to
produce a free encyclopedia.
To secure this goal, policies and practices have been instituted. Whenever
current policies and practices becomes destructive of this goal, it is
appropriate that the community institute such new practices as seem as to
them shall seem most likely to secure the goal of producing a free
encyclopedia.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that practices long established, such as zero-
threshold editing should not be changed for light and transient causes.