One of the things which would greatly improve functioning and
retention of arbitrators is effective advocates who would select and
present evidence which illustrated the contentions of the parties. As
it is now the arbitrators themselves are forced to view the
ridiculous amounts of irrelevant crap which the parties advance as
"evidence" and try to figure out on their own what is going on.
Fred
On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Kelly Martin wrote:
On 10/5/05, Carbonite <carbonite.wp(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
In my opinion, it would also be beneficial to
create panels of 5-7
arbitrators so that the ArbCom could multi-task. Each panel would
only
handle a few cases at a time instead of the entire ArbCom having
to examine
the evidence of every open case. This might also help reduce the
burnout
that's inevitable when every arbitrator must hear every case.
Carbonite
I would prefer to keep the ArbCom at its current size (or close to it)
and establish lower courts to filter off the relatively easy stuff and
to organize the cases into a form so that when they do appeal the
ArbCom doesn't have to waste as much time marshalling the case.
A few Arbitration Assistants would not be remiss, either.
Kelly
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l