Ray Saintonge stated for the record:
David Gerard wrote:
On 10/4/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 10/4/05, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. The opposed groups are not
"inclusionists" versus deletionists,
but *contributors* versus deletionists. (This is still the case even
though the deletionists contribute elsewhere.) Then the deletionists
wonder why the contributors get so damn stroppy.
Does this mean that the deletionist get to relalable them selves as
well? If so can we call it the contributors vs the Encyclopedists ? Or
we could go the other way and let both sides relable to the opposeing
sides.
We could call them HITLER!!!!11!
That guy was imprisoned in the 1920s and that gave him the free time to
write his literary masterpiec. Let's be thankful that there was no
Wikipedia at that time, or he might have used it to write a version of
the AFD rules with a clarity that rivals that of the present rules. :-)
I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of deletionists
suddenly sighed happily....
--
Sean Barrett | The Internet is totally out of control,
sean(a)epoptic.com | impossible to map accurately, and being used far
| beyond its original intentions. So far, so good.