Blair P. Houghton wrote:
No, I didn't violate the 3RR. I read it
right before I made the
second reversion. I knew what I was doing. After a couple of
reversions, I acquiesced to changes others wanted in the edit. The
following revert was to that revision of the edit. The 3RR kept me
from refusing to move on the issue. That I was then accused of
"evading" the 3RR is just another of GeorgeStepanek's prevarications.
That you're buying into it is a shame.
Reverting to different previous versions is reverting.
I'm not going to argue the point of the rule with you. If you wish
to continue being a willing dupe of those who wish to railroad honest
people, then just keep on sullying your robes.
--Blair