Blair P. Houghton wrote:
No, I didn't violate the 3RR. I read it right
before I made the second
reversion. I knew what I was doing. After a couple of reversions, I
acquiesced to changes others wanted in the edit. The following revert
was to that revision of the edit. The 3RR kept me from refusing to move
on the issue. That I was then accused of "evading" the 3RR is just
another of GeorgeStepanek's prevarications. That you're buying into it
is a shame.
Reverting to different previous versions is reverting.
- d.