[WikiEN-l] Re: I have unblocked Blair P. Houghton.

Thu Mar 17 00:51:33 UTC 2005

Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> David Gerard wrote:

>> What bit of the 3RR is ambiguous?

> Who said it was? Read my rebuttal.  I didn't violate the 3RR.

This turns out not to be the case:

05:22, 15 Mar 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11159169
(the revert:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=11159169&oldid=11090304

06:07, 15 Mar 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11159654
(the revert:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=11159654&oldid=11159169)

15:13, 15 Mar 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11169234
(the revert:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=11169234&oldid=11159654)

17:43, 15 Mar 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11177874
(the revert:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=11177874&oldid=11169234)

00:06, 16 Mar 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11184398
(the revert:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=11184398&oldid=11177874)

That's five reversions in under 19 hours. If you don't think this is a 3RR
violation, you have misunderstood the rule and should read it again.

Part of the lack of sympathy for your position may be due to your aggressive
approach. Personal attacks or apparent personal attacks in edit summaries
are *exceedingly* ill-favoured. Please stop making them:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&diff=prev&oldid=11169234
and many examples in 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weight_training&action=history

Please [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]]. Thanks.

- d.