I have unblocked Blair P. Houghton. Re: [WikiEN-l] Unreasonableblock of user Blair P. Houghton by adminCryptoDerk

Wed Mar 16 06:08:23 UTC 2005

----- Original Message -----
Well, let's all step back, take a deep breath, and maybe we can all go forward with good faith.

My broader interest in this is that we are slipping in trying to have editorial standards on Wikiedpia (an encyclopedia first and foremost) at the same time when 3RR and ArbCom are starting to be used as editing tools.

--C

> 
> It was a trap.  GeorgeStepanek accepted almost all of my edits, but 
> only after I was blocked.
> 
> Clearly he wasn't disagreeing with everything I was saying, he was 
> just reverting the page to goad me into re-reverting it.  I did, 
> three times.  Then I changed the edit to include others' 
> suggestions.  Then Taxman continued reverting in GeorgeStepanek's 
> stead.  Then they created the false allegations of 3RR violation.
> 
> And once the unblock actually allows me into the server, I'll 
> repeat all of this on the talk page so everyone concerned can see 
> the mess these guys made.
> 
> --Blair
> 
> Andrew Lih wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:09:30 -0400, Jim Cecropia <jcecropia at mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have unblocked Blair P. Houghton so that he can defend himself 
> >> in the appropriate forums on Wikipedia.
> >>
> >> The 3RR, as I've stated elsewhere, is a loose cannon which tends 
> >> to favor the status-quo. If the there is a content dispute, the 
> >> better solution is to protect the article for a limited time to 
> >> get the combatants to hash out the issue in article talk. In the 
> >> instant case, I notice that GeorgeStepanek, for example, 
> >> numbered his reverts ("first, second, third") which telegraphs 
> >> consciousness of the 3RR as a trap, then another editor who 
> >> disagrees with Houghton picked up on the reverting.
> >
> >
> > It's dangerous to ascribe intent. Simply numbering one's edits does
> > not mean it's a "trap." In fact, *not* numbering them, and losing
> > count, could be construed as a trap as well.
> >
> > But I agree that an outside admin would have served the community
> > better by simply locking the page, and not banning anyone. Somehow
> > this needs to be emphasized on the 3RR page - not all 3R violations
> > need to be followed up by a ban.
> >
> > -Andrew (User:Fuzheado)
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm