Chad Perrin wrote:
That's the lead-in to the purpose of the
conference. It seems like
good news to see yet another recognized authority using Wikipedia to
provide definitions of the terms for the foci of its trade.
This is a great thing, because it also showcases one of our strengths:
We're becoming an authoritative source for summaries of consensus
opinion. A common way of doing that is to find a few authors who have
made statements, like "according to Foo, spyware is 'blah'; according to
Foo2, it's 'blah2'". Wikipedia sort of collects and summarizes those
sorts of things for them.
(For our good articles anyway. :-)
-Mark