I suppose I should make public what has always been an implicit fact
here, and note that I am willing to, assuming, in my judgment, the case
has merits, raise any case to the arbitration committee. Contact me via
e-mail if you have a specific problem user you think needs to be dealt
with and don't feel you can deal with. I can't guarantee I'll deal with
it immediately (I can only manage evidence on so many arbcom cases at
once), but if the case has merit, I will submit it on your behalf.
-Snowspinner
On Mar 10, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Cool Hand Luke wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:28:28 -0800 (PST), Daniel
Mayer
<maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Rick <giantsrick13(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I think we've discussed ad nauseum how people
are
afraid to request sanctions against other users
because of the perceived (and real) threat that the
arbcom will turn it against the person bringing the
case.
Name a case where that happened.
-- mav
Even in cases where the petitioner is ultimately cleared, arbitration
requires an arduous defense. For people that would rather, say, work
on wikipedia, arbitration is a hassle. No sane individual would want
to draw fire from a troll who wants nothing more than to launch
spurious attacks.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l