The notion that it will somehow create an
encyclopedia filled with " nothing but dumbed-down pap" is a bald
assertion
which has no basis in reality.
Jay
I would agree that Ec overstates the case. The point that seems to need
making is that none of the content policies actually _makes for_ brilliant
prose, which is one thing we also want. If clumsily or over-insistently
applied, any reliability-oriented policy can make for lame writing.
Academic books don't read like Tom Clancy.
So I say that content policies are also subordinate to the goal of creating
awesomeness in the encyclopedia. I like to think in terms of two extremes,
Blandopedia and Gonzopedia. The spaced-out stuff has to be squeezed out.
But playing safe will only tend to accentuate the bias towards WP's existing
strengths.
Charles