[WikiEN-l] Rules, expertise, and encyclopedic standards
JAY JG
jayjg at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 8 15:06:25 UTC 2005
>From: Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net>
>
>JAY JG wrote:
>
>>>From: "Charles Matthews" <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com>
>>>
>>>JAY JG wrote
>>>
>>> > Perhaps the [[Wikipedia:No original research]] page needs to be
>>>updated with
>>> > examples which make that point that if it really is that simple,
>>>someone
>>> > else will have done the work for you already, and all you need to do
>>>is
>>> > quote them.
>>>
>>>Literally speaking, conversion of temperatures from Fahrenheit to Celsius
>>>would fall foul of this. And numerous other things: such as conversion
>>>of
>>>dates out of one calendar system into another, metrication, currency
>>>conversion, inverting family relationships from 'nephew' to 'uncle' ...
>>
>>No, that's a strawman argument. "Deductive reasoning" becomes original
>>research when it is used to build a case against a position presented in
>>an article, not when used to do unit conversions. Now if you were to
>>assert that based on genetics and "simple deductive reasoning" that uncles
>>were more closely related to nephews than aunts were to nieces, that would
>>be original research, and you'd have to find some source which supported
>>it.
>
>That's certainly an extremist view.
Ray, labels like this aren't helpful.
>It implies that a crackpot theory is acceptable as long as it has
>previously been published somewhere else.
Nothing of the sort. The "NPOV policy" indicates that extreme minority
views need not be presented in an article, so that issue is well covered.
>However, if the public thought that the theory was so ridiculous that they
>felt it a waste of time to dispute it we would not be allowed to publish a
>refutation on the grounds that it was original research.
You wouldn't need to refute it, since you wouldn't need to cite it in the
first place, as above.
>You seem to forget the original purpose for the rule.
I don't think so; what do you think I have forgotten?
Jay.
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list