I think you should just start doing those things. The questions and answers
will be on the record and will be evidence which we can consider especially
when we look at remedies.
Fred
From: Theresa Knott <theresaknott(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Theresa Knott <theresaknott(a)gmail.com>om>, English Wikipedia
<wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:10:32 +0000
To: Brian M <brian1954(a)gmail.com>om>, English Wikipedia
<wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
I agree. I came to the AC after it was formed and it's way of working
was set. But personally i hate the jargon and the quasilegalistic way
of working. I would like to go to the people concerned and ask
questions "Why did you remove that chunk of text" "Do you regret
calling him a shithead and have you said or done anything by way of an
aplogy" "If you had to to it again, would you have handled it
differently?" that sort of thing. I'd like things to be far more
informal than they are at the moment, but i don't know how the
community feel about that, and i don't want to break a process, that
basically works (even though it has its faults)
Theresa