[WikiEN-l] Strange fetishes

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen at shaw.ca wrote:

Actually, IMO at least it seems perfectly reasonable to enforce the 3RR
even against people who are making reverts that when made in isolation
would be considered "reasonable."

That's actually my point. For Wikipedia to be managable, procedure must be 
followed and policies must be enforced. Thus, the statements that I'd quoted 
were **unfortunately** reasonable. The problem is the nature of the 
procedure making this approach reasonable.

IMO needs radical change, along the lines of Larry Sanger's suggestions. The 
way things are now, certain trolls flourish while professional historians 
like Jtdril (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jtdirl#3RR_block) and 
Adam Carr get blocked. Some bold structural changes would serve to correct 
this problem.

-172

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]