No, calling other Wikipedia users "morons" will get you in trouble,
especially if you try to excuse yourself with the explanation that you
thought the other user "really was a moron". The two users were not treated
the same. There was no question that Xed had a problem. But carefully
reading the edits revealed the problems that Slrubenstein was having also.
It is just a case of going through the edits one by one and watching what
happened step by step.
Fred
From: "JAY JG" <jayjg(a)hotmail.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:22:10 -0500
To: wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to "equal treatment"?
Recently a Wikipedia editor e-mailed me regarding concerns she had about the
ArbCom process. In particular, she was looking at an ArbCom case brought up
against an editor who (aside from a couple of articles) has added little in
the way of actual content, copyedits, or housekeeping to the project, but
who has long been noted for personal attacks, trolling, edit-warring, and
who has been temp-banned more than once. As seems to be typical in these
cases, the person being brought before ArbCom created a "counter
arbitration" defense against one complainant in particular (a long time
contributer of much valued content, though perhaps given to getting a little
personal in disputes). As a matter of policy, the behaviour of those who
were bringing the complaint was examined with equal intensity. As the
person e-mailing me put it
"It looks like the arbcom is going to put them both on POV parole, which is
silly; they have this thing about equal treatment. It's like if I report
someone to the police for a theft, the police first of all have to
investigate whether I've committed theft too, because if they charge one,
they have to charge both."
Is this a valid concern?
Jay.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l