Annual 're-affirmation' would be a nightmare on WP - there's, what,
400+ admins? That means we'd need to do _more_ than one of these
_every day_.
This - all of this discussion in fact - still looks like a solution
hunting *desperately* for a problem.
Dan
On 21/06/05, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Rebecca a écrit:
On 6/22/05, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Hmmm, whatever.
I do not want to imply you are wrong and I am right Ambi. Please do not.
Only that your certainty in the previous mail that it would be
" a terrible, terrible idea, Anthere" is just a tiny bit shaken by the
fact already two projects as I know of, chose this way of reconfirmation
of sysophood (annually I think, not certain though). I do not list meta
within these two, as indeed it is a bit special project, with less
chance of edit wars (though there are some).
But the point is, some communities on other wikipedia projects chose
this path voluntarily. There is no real reason why a community would be
entirely right to go one way and another entirely wrong to go another,
and vice-versa. I do not know which is the best way and I doubt I could
find out alone. But this path was already chosen voluntarily by
*consensus*. So, it can't be entirely a terrible idea :-).
Ant