not to educate. We wouldn't tolerate intentionally
offensive prose,
and we should not tolerate intentionally offensive images.
Only in the last 20th century there has happened hundreds of massacres
that a textual description of would make anyone sick to their stomach.
Should we not tolerate someone writing or reciting this?
Loose the word "intentionally" because noone can accurately guess
someon else intent. Loose the word "offensive" because not everyone
takes offense. What you are left with is a picture of shit in an
article about shit.
You have heard it lots that Wikipedia is not a "vehicle of free
speech". But Wikipedia is not a vehicle for the morale conservatists
to present their opinion as the truth.
--
mvh Björn