[WikiEN-l] Fwd: Wikipedia is fun, but credibility varies a lot

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: Wikipedia is fun, but credibility varies a lot
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: Wikipedia is fun, but credibility varies a lot
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Speaking of obvious errors, here is a typo: PdP -> PhD 

--- Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- steve v <vertigosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The article did'nt have any real substance to respond
> > to anyway, so why bother? I know, I know--care
> > requires correctionality. Hmph.
> 
> Irony. The article was critical of Wikipedia for not being vetted by experts
> and thus not reliable. Yet it was written by a person with a PdD who made
> very
> obvious factual errors that have yet to be corrected.
> 
> I have yet to get a response from her, but I don't expect one either.  
> 
> -- mav
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: Wikipedia is fun, but credibility varies a lot
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Fwd: Wikipedia is fun, but credibility varies a lot
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]