[WikiEN-l] William M. Connoley, admin? (was: Running the asylum)

Fri Jul 15 21:45:40 UTC 2005

If the problems William M. Connoley presents were temporary, I would  
not have objected to Administrator status for him. He believes a  
Wikipedia article should prominently feature the "truth." While this  
sounds ok on its face, in practice any method of arriving at the  
truth though reference to expert editors such as himself presents  
prospects of sustained conflict. Our references need to be to  
reputable published information.

Fred

On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Dan Grey wrote:

> Y'know, one thing leaps out at me - how can 70/30 for/against possibly
> be a 'no'? Turn it on it's head for a moment - 30/70 for/against, yet
> it (whatever it is) is passed - that would madness, right? But that's
> what we're saying here.
>
>
>> Someone will renominate him in a month or two and he'll be a shoo-in.
>>
>
> No doubt.
>
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>