[WikiEN-l] William M. Connoley, admin? (was: Running the asylum)

Fri Jul 15 00:18:50 UTC 2005

Poor, Edmund W (Edmund.W.Poor at abc.com) [050715 02:53]:

> I'm thinking of deciding this one myself.
> Dr. William M. Connolley can be trusted not to abuse admin powers, and
> it's not supposed to be a big deal. He got 70% to 30%, but a lot of the
> objections were irrelevant in my opinion.
> I had objected vociferously at first (go ahead, look it up ;-) but Erik
> (user:Eloquence) convinced me to change my vote to neutral. I have been
> reading the comment stream, and now I feel I should take matters into my
> own hands.
> Any objections?

70-30 is good but not quite there. Almost anyone with a score like that
makes it through the next time. I think this is a "when in doubt, do
nothing" case.

Someone will renominate him in a month or two and he'll be a shoo-in.

- d.