[WikiEN-l] William M. Connoley, admin? (was: Running the asylum)

Thu Jul 14 17:41:04 UTC 2005

Poor, Edmund W wrote:

>I'm thinking of deciding this one myself.
>
>Dr. William M. Connolley can be trusted not to abuse admin powers, and
>it's not supposed to be a big deal. He got 70% to 30%, but a lot of the
>objections were irrelevant in my opinion.
>
>I had objected vociferously at first (go ahead, look it up ;-) but Erik
>(user:Eloquence) convinced me to change my vote to neutral. I have been
>reading the comment stream, and now I feel I should take matters into my
>own hands.
>
>Any objections?
>
>Ed Poor
>Bureaucrat 
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>  
>
I would request a Bureaucrat who was not so closely involved (i.e. one 
who did not edit war and deface other comments in this discussion) make 
the decision on this particular RFA.