Stan Shebs wrote:
Yes, the 32K limit should still be encouraged. Not
only is there
still the risk of old browsers mangling long articles, but this
is the encyclopedia, not wikibooks. People delighting in long
articles should consider that 99% of readers will drop off long
before they get to the end of a 5,000-word article, so it's as
if the material at the end doesn't even exist; better to make
several shorter articles interlinked so readers can steer to the
desired details more quickly.
Stan
Stan, those readers will probably drop off after 32KB anyway. Best to
fixup the lead section and let them read that.
TBSDY