Tony Sidaway wrote:
Christiaan Briggs said:
Well you'll have to excuse me, you seem clear
enough of mind not to
have missed this: as we discussed image holders could be used in the
same way as using your browser to defer image downloads. The
difference would be that only some of the images would be deferred
instead of all of them.
It seems to me that which images are to be deferred would be decided
by someone other than the reader. This would probably compromise
NPOV.
To use a browser as you suggest defers ALL images. This way defers some
images. And in either case the user is in control as which images are
then loaded. Please Tony, I beg of you, why are you talking in circles?
Christiaan