No more so than is taking place with controversial images already. And
as Nicholas has noted categories are highly unlikely to be have such
vague labels as "offensive". The point, remember, is that we are trying
to identify not "offensive" but "potentially offensive", therefore
category labels would be chosen for the NPOV quality. Can you really
see people arguing over whether an image is of "human body parts"?
Christiaan
Rick wrote:
I'm afraid that there is going to be a lot of edit
warring as we try
to put things into categories like "Offensive images" or "pictures of
human body parts" or "Violent imagery".
RickK