2) We also
need to be able to protect the young and the vulnerable
adult who ARE upset by images like these, which in my view OUGHT to
be
on WP.
For the latter maybe something like the system UK newsagents have,
with the raunchy stuff being on the 'Top shelf' , and everything else
lower down where even children can reach it.
But there is, in my view, no easy answer.
A final thought is that a number of our editors are youngsters, one
or
two not yet in their teens. How do we stand in regard to their
parents
on this?
Wikipedia in its current form is not suitable for these people. We
should
be honest about this--at least as honest as other sites that contain,
among general material, some items that are not considered suitable for
children.