Theresa Knott a écrit:
The reasoning behind this is so that an admin cannot
use their powers
to win against an anon admin when they are in a revert war. This is
not the case here. Although it would have probably been wiser for
TBSDY to ask another admin to block SS-88 for making the above threat
I cannot see how it could have been considered an abuse of admin
powers.
Theresa
Non making any comment on whether the person should be unsysoped or not
unsysoped, I think that as soon as editors question the action of a
sysop or not, it is worth listening and considering.
That means there must be a clear process where editors can put their
complaint against a sysop and express their wish that this editor is
removed from sysophood. It is important that if there is no more trust
from a sizeable number of editors, sysophood is removed.
I wonder if the simplest thing is not that as soon as a sizeable number
of people doubt that a person should stay a sysop, the process could be
simply that these users should be reconfirmed in their sysop status.
Make it a vote just of the same type of the vote to become of sysop. If
a reasonable number of support is obtained the person stay a sysop, if
not, removed.
The only thing you need to do is that the initial request is made by a
trusted person, to avoid trolling.
There is an easy way to do this : have it a requirement that listing the
person on the admin/deadmin list be made by a sysop himself.
Ant