Nicholas Knight (nknight(a)runawaynet.com) [050219 12:23]:
David Gerard wrote:
>Nicholas Knight (nknight(a)runawaynet.com) [050219 10:30]:
>>Christiaan Briggs wrote:
>>>These are done purely on editorial
grounds. When we make a decision to
>>>hide or remove an image based on some people's moral objections that it
>>>is "pornographic", "disgusting", "sexually
explicit", etc. we are not
>>>making a purely editorial decision.
>>For me, this has about as much to do with
morality as my dislike of
>>carrots.
>Your objection, as I understood it, was that it
was disgusting. Correct me
>if I'm wrong, but primarily you seemed to be disgusted.
Which has what to do with morality?
That you seemed to be giving it similar weight as a reason not to have such
an image on that article.
- d.