Tony Sidaway wrote:
Bill Konrad said:
Nonsense. For more than 99% of the articles there would be absolutely
no question regarding whether or not the content is suitable.
I think we're talking to cross purposes. Your statement does not
contradict mine.
Yes, I think there is some misuderstanding. I do not understand how you can
maintain that all editors would have to bowlderize all of their edits when
for more than 99% of the articles there is no consideration whatsoever of
bowlderization being an issue.
Bkonrad