Ray Saintonge wrote:
Nicholas Knight wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
There is a middle ground that satisfies the great
majority of the
Earth's
population. An extreme "left" position that insists on videos of
intercourse
I'm rather extreme left-wing with all that entails relative to the
vast majority of the Earth's and Wikipedia's population, and you
certainly don't see me insisting on any such thing.
I'll defend its right to exist with my life if absolutely neccessary,
but I'm certainly not going to insist that it either exist or be
placed on Wikipedia.
Some people will go overboard by allocating everything along a
left-right spectrum. This puts Fred in the uncharacteristic position of
suggesting that the extreme left supports extreme freedom.
I would suggest that if either Hitler or Stalin were the one deciding
about the status of the autofellation picture on Wikipedia, he would
have insisted that it is immoral and not tolerated it at all.
That's not a "left" thing, anyway. With all the leftists running around
calling libertarians "right wing extremists", it should be fairly
obvious that supporting the right to distribute pictures of
autofellation isn't left-wing since that's pretty well libertarian
canonical opinion. That aside, though . . .
I've been deleting large sections of this series of threads without
reading them, because I've had to do some actual work and would never
get caught up if I read them all. Has there been any significant
progress on the idea of developing code that will create an
opt-in/opt-out solution to the problem of inlining controversial images?
--
Chad