On 2/16/05 9:39 AM, "Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com> wrote:
David Gerard said:
Christopher Mahan (chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com) [050216
14:27]:
--- Arno M <redgum46(a)lycos.com> wrote:
> It is not an encycopedia's task to do PR
for terrorists,
> especially
> ones who are as ruthless as these.
Then Auschwitz pics are out of the question,
right?
I don't know if anyone's working on code for the inline vs link user
option, but it would probably beat the fork that appears to be coming
on the issue.
Are forks such a bad idea? It would solve the child-safe problem. The
adult Wikipedia could possibly also drop a lot of the trivia that are
mostly of interest to children. TV show episode guides, comics, games and
the like. Presumably article and history information could still be
interchanged.
Yeah, television, comics, games -- trivia for children. Boo, popular and low
culture. Why won't everyone realize that the only things they should be
thinking about are Handelian overtures and eating brussels sprouts?
I adore Handel and good fresh brussels sprouts, but really. Contemporary and
popular art and culture are not trivia for children.