Tony Sidaway wrote:
Bill Konrad said:
It's a bit of a broad exageration to claim
ALL editors would have to
bowlderize ALL of their edits.
No, it's absolutely true. Just one goes and vandalizes the article on the
American Revolution, on one day, and you'll have school governors freaking
out.
Huh? What does the ever-present problem with vandalism have to do with
placing images potentially offensive to many behind a link instead of inline
(or what you seem to characterize as "bowlderizing")?
Whether some articles might contain offensive vandalism for a short time is
a very different matter from what is accepted as appropriate content by the
community (and by extension by the MediaWiki foundation). Both may pose
problems to school administrators and parents regarding the suitability of
Wikipedia for children, but the vast majority of vandalism is not much
different from what is scrawled on bathroom walls or heard in the
schoolyard. Given that most such vandalism is quickly removed, it is of an
entirely different nature than more or less permanent content sanctioned by
the community.
Bkonrad