Tony Sidaway wrote:
Nicholas Knight said:
No, it's an objection to shoving explicit and
disgusting images in what
is supposed to be an encyclopedia for the purpose of trying to force
the world to somehow "de-prudify" itself.
Who has advanced this argument for including the picture?
No one. If you'll look back at the exact sequence of the conversation,
you'll understand where this came from. It's predicated on images like
the autofelleto one becoming accepted parts of Wikipedia, and is not
specific to the photograph in question.