[WikiEN-l] Re: Writing about sexual topics responsibly is not censorship

Mon Feb 14 03:16:42 UTC 2005

Chad Perrin wrote:
> Nicholas Knight wrote:
> 
>> I continue to see no usefulness in it, and the "why not" is because 
>> people _will not use wikipedia_, and quite likely, existing editors 
>> would leave. I certainly would if this became an accepted part of 
>> Wikipedia. It would be a final demonstration that the people here are 
>> not the least bit interested in constructing a useful educational 
>> resource, but seek only to shove a social agenda down other's throats.
> 
> 
> Now you've really lost me.  Who seeks "only to shove a social agenda 
> down other's [sic] throats"?  What social agenda do you mean?  This 
> isn't some kind of moral objection to the act of autofellatio, is it?

No, it's an objection to shoving explicit and disgusting images in what 
is supposed to be an encyclopedia for the purpose of trying to force the 
world to somehow "de-prudify" itself.