[WikiEN-l] Re: Writing about sexual topics responsibly is not censorship

Mon Feb 14 03:10:11 UTC 2005

Nicholas Knight wrote:

> I continue to see no usefulness in it, and the "why not" is because 
> people _will not use wikipedia_, and quite likely, existing editors 
> would leave. I certainly would if this became an accepted part of 
> Wikipedia. It would be a final demonstration that the people here are 
> not the least bit interested in constructing a useful educational 
> resource, but seek only to shove a social agenda down other's throats.

Now you've really lost me.  Who seeks "only to shove a social agenda 
down other's [sic] throats"?  What social agenda do you mean?  This 
isn't some kind of moral objection to the act of autofellatio, is it?

--
Chad