Nicholas Knight said:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Nicholas Knight said:
Can you give me a single example of a case where a
PHOTOGRAPH of a
sexual act is meaningfully more useful than a line drawing?
I can. A photograph of autofellatio convincingly demonstrates that
this extraordinary act is achievable by some men. A line drawing can
only give an artist's impress of how perhaps it *might* be done,
should it be possible.
If Wikipedia has to rely on photographs to say something is possible, a
critical credibility problem exists.
It doesn't have to rely on them, but they're very effective for this
purpose. I've got blind colleagues who manage very well without being
able to see a thing, but this doesn't mean that sight isn't also useful.
And even IF you're correct, that does not in any way require an inlined
image.
I agree. It does not. But if it's a useful illustration, why not?